Notes on the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution

Rousseau tomb

Tomb of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) in the Panthéon, Paris;
photo credit Marko Kudjerski

blue bar

In many respects, Sir Isaac Newton, 1642-1727, was the bridge between the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. His successful attempt to discover and formulate laws of nature, such as the laws of motion and the law of gravity, inspired many of the philosophes and laid the logical basis for the Enlightenment. If nature was governed by natural laws, then it could also be reasoned that man and society were governed by natural laws too. If those laws could be discovered, then nature, man and society could be controlled and manipulated to allow society and mankind to prosper and flourish. Thus, the general aim of the Enlightenment was progress and the consequent improvement of the human condition. Enlightenment thinkers and philosophers were relatively optimistic about the attempt to improve the condition of man.

Just as much as the Renaissance had entered on a rebirth of interest in ancient Greek and Roman art and literature, the Enlightenment also turned back to the classics for inspiration, focusing on the Greek (and Roman) use of rational thought (logic) and science to understand the natural world. The philosophes, the key French Enlightenment figures, were critics of the imperfections of the existing status quo, and they launched a wide-ranging assault on church, state and society, determined to identify the illogicalities of the human world and its socio-political institutions. Thus, the philosophes believed that they could improve human society and make the world a better place in which to live by figuring out what was wrong with the world. What these intellectual critics accomplished was the laying of the intellectual foundations for the American and French revolutions of the eighteenth century.

We have some great suggested readings and videos in this unit of HIS 112!

blue bar

Some recommended online lectures and websites